And Then You're Dead

Journal / Essay

The Math of Despair

Economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton coined "deaths of despair" to describe a specific pattern: rising mortality from alcohol, drugs, and suicide, concentrated among people squeezed by exactly the kind of economic pressure documented throughout this journal. This piece covers the numbers carefully — including the real, recent, fragile good news.

And Then You're Dead · August 2026 · 6 min read

If you or someone you know is struggling, the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is free, confidential, and available 24/7 by call or text at 988.

Rows of gravestones in a foggy cemetery
Brastad Church graveyard. The research this piece covers is specifically about deaths that track economic circumstance, not chance.

This isn't a story about individual weakness. Case and Deaton's original research tied the rise directly to declining economic prospects among working-age Americans without a college degree — the same wage stagnation, healthcare cost, and retirement insecurity documented elsewhere in this journal, expressed as mortality instead of a bank statement.

The Peak

In 2021, combined deaths from alcohol, drugs, and suicide reached the highest level ever recorded.

0
Americans who died from alcohol, drugs, or suicide in 2021 — an all-time record
0
deaths per 100,000 people — the peak rate, also a record

The Turn

This is the part of this journal that gets to report something actually improving, and it deserves to be said plainly: the numbers turned around, meaningfully, for the first time in a generation.

2024 saw 16% fewer deaths of despair than 2023 — the first significant decline since 1999. Drug overdose deaths alone fell 26%.
0%
decline in drug overdose deaths, 2023 to 2024
0%
decline in alcohol-induced deaths over the same year

The decline held across nearly every demographic and geographic group tracked — not a fluke in one region or one age bracket. Suicide deaths declined more modestly, about 3%, and synthetic opioids like fentanyl remain the single deadliest category by far. But the direction, broadly, changed for the first time in two decades.

What's Now at Risk

Declines like this don't happen by accident. They follow expanded treatment access, naloxone availability, and sustained public health funding — and that funding was just cut.

Grant funding lost by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

~$1 Billion

funding that supported medication-assisted treatment, overdose data collection, and suicide prevention programs

A trend this fragile, built on funding this recently cut, is not a guarantee. It's evidence that the number can move in the right direction when there's investment behind it — and a live question about what happens to that direction without it.

And Then You're Dead

This is the most literal version of this journal's name, and the one place in it where the trend line, for now, points somewhere better. That happened because of specific, fundable, defundable decisions — not luck. Whether it keeps happening is still being decided, in budget meetings, right now. That's the plan. That's the math.

That's it. That's the whole thing.

Sources

Photo: Rows of granite graves, Brastad Church graveyard, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0).